Meath railway saga

 

 


Navan rail line 100% certain, says Dempsey

Ann Casey
reports

The site of the proposed new Navan Central rail station at the rear of Pairc Tailteann. The station is to be located where the Navan-Dublin line will join the existing Tara Mines line to Drogheda.MINISTER for Transport Noel Dempsey yesterday (Tuesday) swept aside doubts expressed by Iarnrod Eireann on Monday about the viability of reopening the Navan-Dublin rail line and declared that he was "100 per cent" behind the project.
"It will happen," Mr Dempsey told the Meath Chronicle, hours after the rail company briefed Meath County councillors that the next phase of the reopening of the line, costing €578, was "not financially viable" and "would require the full capital costs to be borne by the Government".
He said that Iarnrod Eireann`s approach to the project had been "extremely conservative", and quoted the scoping study which had clearly stated that the project was a valuable one which would justify the use of public funds. The minister also said that the company had taken a very conservative view of projected population figures along the route using 2002 census figures.
Eighty-five per cent of the forecast population increase would have to be realised in Navan, Dunshaughlin and Kilmessan before the project could proceed. "Not only did they use 2002 census figures, but they did not take into account the projected population growth in Trim, which is expected to go from 7,000 to 17,000 in 10 to 15 years, and similar growth in Kells," added Mr Dempsey.
The rate of economic return from the restored rail line is marked in at four per cent, according to Department of Finance guidelines. Mr Dempsey said that the rate of return on the Navan-Dublin project would be 4.6 per cent, "so I have no doubt at all about the viability of it".
The reopening of the line is planned as part of the Government`s Transport 21 infrastructure programme. The first phase, from Clonsilla to an interchange with the M3 at Pace, is scheduled to open within two years.
Iarnrod Eireann has already announced that its preferred route, out of nine options, would follow the line of the old Navan-Dublin line which opened in the mid-1800s. A study on the viability of the reopening revealed that the emerging preferred route would use two-thirds of the pre-existing line, with an extension to create a station at Navan North to link up with an existing but now disused Kingscourt line.
Meath on Track, the organisation campaigning for the restoration of the Navan-Dublin line, said that it was disappointed Iarnrod Eireann had said the project would not be viable. "That is no surprise since no rail line in the State is viable, not one fully covers it costs," said its spokesperson, Proinsias Mac Fhearghusa.
"The reason the company is saying it would not be viable is because it is maintaining that the initial capital investment would have to be met out of running costs. What is also unfair is that the figure of €580 million for the project is a 2015 figure," he added.
Also included in the projected cost were fleet acquisition expenses of €78 million. "However, large parts of the existing network are to be electrified and all that diesel stock, which could not be used on an electrified line, would become available for Navan," he added.
The finding of the Iarnrod Eireann study on the Dunboyne to Navan railway line found that, over a 30-year period, revenue from passengers would just cover operating costs, leaving no surplus to cover capital investment.
The study was carried out by Roughan O`Donovan - Faber Maunsell on behalf of Iarnrod Eireann.
However, a meeting of Meath County Council heard on Monday that the project would be viable under criteria used by the Department of Finance to evaluate major projects in terms of the wider benefit to the community and the local economy.
Councillors heard that, in today`s terms, the cost of the line was estimated at €455 million but, allowing for inflation, this would rise to €578 million during the construction period in 2010/2013.
Jim O`Donovan of Roughan O`Donovan explained that a route closely following the old railway line with an extension to a second railway station in north Navan was the emerging preferred route.
He explained that it was proposed to provide a twin track along the route, as a single track and passing loops would have insufficient capacity to provide a reliable service.
Councillors heard that the journey time to Navan would be approximately one hour with trains every 15 minutes at peak times and stations at north and central Navan, at Drumree, Kilmessan and Pace, near Dunboyne.
There would be diversions from the old line to avoid the M3 between Pace and Batterstown and at Drumree to locate the station at the Dunshaughlin M3 interchange. There would also be diversions west of Kilmessan and west of Cannistown to avoid existing properties.
The study ruled out routes that would take in Ratoath, Ashbourne and Dunshaughlin  but the emerging preferred route will travel close to Dunshaughlin. It was estimated that the extension from Pace to Navan would provide 5,600 additional daily passengers on the line.
Tom Finn, Iarnrod Eireann`s Transport 21 manager, said that 85 per cent of the current projected population growth was needed to justify the development of the line and even the slightest dip in population could have a significant effect on  its viability.
He said that 25 per cent of the capital costs could be provided through development levies with the remainder being sought from the Exchequer. He said that while the project did meet the guidelines in terms of economic appraisal, there were a lot of other projects competing for similar Exchequer funds.
Meanwile, Mr Finn said he was confident that there would be a rail link from Dublin to Dunboyne in 2010. While a decision on the railway order for this project wasn`t due until 19th February, he was confident it would be granted, allowing work on the link to begin by the end of this year. He said it would take two years to complete and would be commissioned in 2010.

No PDF AvailableNo Document AvailableNo Audio AvailableNo Video AvailableImages Available

 

Editorial 19/01/08

THE extraordinary confusion sowed by Iarnrod Eireann (Irish Rail) last week concerning the viability of reopening passenger rail services between Navan and Dublin has taken a further twist this week as it has been revealed that the senior manager who told Meath County Councillors the route was not financially viable has been removed from his post.
Transport 21 project manager with Iarnrod Eireann, Tom Finn, has been removed from his post following controversial comments made to Meath County Councillors last week about the planned rail line between Navan and Dunboyne not being economically viable and that "financially, you would not touch it with a barge pole because of the costs". The remarks are understood to have infuriated senior management at the State rail company.
Iarnrod Eireann has, however, delivered an upbeat assessment this week of the planned project to reopen the rail link, contradicting the statement made to councillors last week, and indicating that is financially viable and that this was the only criterion that mattered when evaluating transport projects.
This project is a crucial plank in this county`s future transport infrastructure designed to take thousands of commuters off the roads each day and deliver them in relative comfort to their jobs in the city and deposit them home again each evening. Living in Meath and working in Dublin would be made so much easier by the reintroduction of rail services between Navan and Dublin, but it is widely felt that the target date of 2015 is too long for commuters to wait. It does appear there may now be potential to deliver the project two years earlier, in 2013.
It is obvious to everyone who wants to see this project get underway that an eight-year time horizon is much too conservative, particularly when, in 1859, it took only three years to clear and build the 26-mile track to Dublin by hand with picks and shovels. With 21st century equipment and modern-track-laying technology at its disposal, it should be eminently possible to reconstruct the line in a shorter timeframe than 2015, especially as the emerging preferred route, according to Iarnrod Eireann`s scooping study, is along the existing alignment, with a few minor deviations.
There now seems to be no doubt that this railway project is economically viable. Passenger services will cost €6.8 million per annum to run and this cost can be met entirely by revenue generated on the new line. Meath On Track says that modelling based on 85 per cent of population growth expected in the catchment area of the service and utilising demand from comparable population centres on the Dublin-Belfast line means the service could be up and running within five years.
Welcome also in the recent study is the plan for a station and park `n` ride facility at Dunshaughlin, beside the town`s M3 interchange, and two stations in Navan - Navan Central at the rear of Pairc Tailteann and Navan North on the Kells Road, which can cater for commuters from north Meath. A further welcome aspect of the scooping study is the plan to build double track rather than a single commuter line which, it was felt, would have too many operational challenges.
So the Government`s commitment is there and so now, it appears, is Iarnrod Eireann`s. The key signal for this vital transport initiative, however, is still awaited from the Department of Finance and that is that the capital costs of almost €580 million will be made available. The dark economic clouds gathering on the horizon must not be used as an excuse to put this project on the back burner and there must be no let up in the Dept of Transport`s commitment to see this project through to completion in an effort to tackle once and for all the substantial public transport deficit from which Meath continues to suffer. 

No PDF AvailableNo Document AvailableNo Audio AvailableNo Video AvailableNo Images Available http://www.meathchronicle.ie/story.asp?stID=1882&cid=128&cid2=